Topic archive
Virtual asset, crypto asset, custody, exchange and MiCA CASP frameworks, including VARA, DIFC, ADGM and EU expectations for operators and founders. Use this topic to compare how crypto permissions differ by regulator, what substance and safeguarding evidence is usually expected, and where a VASP or CASP route fits before banking, custody and token-flow decisions are locked in.
Archive
03 entries
European VASPs facing MiCA deadlines often have two bottlenecks at once: CASP authorisation timing and banking or EMI onboarding that moves more slowly than the regulatory calendar.
The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets framework introduces CASP authorisation requirements that replace existing national VASP regimes. Capital thresholds, conduct rules, and white-paper duties are now standardised — and the compliance shape of an EU crypto business changes accordingly.
Three Emirati regimes, three different theories of supervision. We unpack how the regulators differ on safekeeping rules, client asset segregation and capital — and where each makes sense depending on your operating model.
